by lgillis » Mon Jun 09, 2025 6:06 am
Of course, people naturally like to help, but if, as is the case here, the operators repeatedly and explicitly forbid any interference in their private web presence, then that should be respected. Anything else would be the capitalist model, in which profits are privatized and losses are socialized.
Hierarchies, in which the power of the powerful and not the better argument counts, are well known to people. Perhaps it would be better to have your "somebodys" on extra patrol, because as we all know, four eyes see more than two. We could also ask ourselves how it came about that a once committed participant leaves his both-way accessible servers unattended for an extended period of time.
Of course, people naturally like to help, but if, as is the case here, the operators repeatedly and explicitly forbid any interference in their private web presence, then that should be respected. Anything else would be the capitalist model, in which profits are privatized and losses are socialized.
Hierarchies, in which the power of the powerful and not the better argument counts, are well known to people. Perhaps it would be better to have your "somebodys" on extra patrol, because as we all know, four eyes see more than two. We could also ask ourselves how it came about that a once committed participant leaves his both-way accessible servers unattended for an extended period of time.